Development test results

Engineered.
Measured. Refined.

Bending and flight-vibration comparisons help us evaluate the frame architecture and guide the next design iteration.

01 / Three-point bending

More stiffness in
the tested frame.

~3.5×

Global bending stiffness versus the conventional carbon-fiber frame in this comparison.

The test used matched span, dimensions and mass. Three runs were repeated on the same frame for each design.

Read the test method

Stiffness is the slope of the force–displacement response from a linear fit over 20–150 N. Approximate values are read from the supplied test chart. The three runs measure repeatability on one frame per design, not variability across three independent specimens. This is structural stiffness, not material strength or ultimate failure load.

Global bending stiffness · N/mm

CarbonForm frame~32.0
Conventional CF frame~9.1
035 N/mm
Linear fit: 20–150 N. Matched test conditions. Values rounded from the supplied results.
Test comparison
DesignStiffnessRuns
CarbonForm frame~32.0 N/mm3 repeats
Conventional CF frame~9.1 N/mm3 repeats

02 / Flight vibration

Lower vibration in
the selected flight.

64.8%

Lower raw gyro RMS than the CF-sheet baseline in the best of two CarbonForm flights.

Both CarbonForm flights recorded lower values than the single baseline flight in this dataset.

Read the comparison scope

Raw gyro RMS over 30–800 Hz, normalized to a CF-sheet baseline of 100. CarbonForm flights measured 35.2 and 40.8. The headline uses the lower of the two values. This development comparison does not establish a guaranteed reduction across all aircraft, flight conditions or configurations.

Vibration index · Lower is better

CF-sheet baseline100.0
CarbonForm · selected flight35.2
0100
Raw gyro RMS, 30–800 Hz. Best of two CarbonForm flights versus one CF-sheet baseline.

The second CarbonForm flight measured 40.8, equivalent to a 59.2% reduction relative to this baseline.

Evaluate your configuration

Your mission defines
the test.

Match the airframe to your electronics, payload and operating requirements, then agree on an evaluation plan.

STRUCTURE

Stiffness & mass

Compare defined configurations at matched dimensions, loading and test conditions.

INTEGRATION

Vibration & flight

Evaluate the frame with the propulsion, control settings and payload of the target aircraft.

SERVICE

Impact & repair

Define impact conditions and inspect the structure, interfaces and replacement workflow.

Evaluate it on your platform.

Contact us to discuss test data, frame configurations and an evaluation build.

Discuss your project